Goblin House
Ron Wyden has accepted documented donations from sectors with material interests in "Section 230 reform votes since 2024" but has no public statement, vote, or hearing record on the topic. Expected position: Co-author of Section 230 — would expect floor statements during reform debates Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: Active on adjacent tech-policy topics (CHIPS oversight, AI exec order) during the same window per congress.gov press releases Primary URL: https://www.wyden.senate.gov/news/press-releases Days silent: 365. The constituent is owed an explanation of the official's position.
Subject: Constituent request: hearing on Ron Wyden has not publicly weighed in on Section 230 reform votes since 2024 Dear Members of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, I am writing to ask the committee to hold a public hearing on the following matter that falls within your jurisdiction: Ron Wyden has not publicly weighed in on Section 230 reform votes since 2024. The basis of this request is documented in publicly available evidence summarised here: Ron Wyden has not publicly weighed in on Section 230 reform votes since 2024. Full evidence trail with source citations: https://goblinhouse.net/wall/disclosure-gap-ron-wyden-section-230-reform-votes-since-2024 This matter has not, to my …
Subject: Tip — Ron Wyden has not publicly weighed in on Section 230 reform votes since 2024 Hi The Lever team, Tipping you to a documented accountability gap that aligns with your beat (Money in politics, regulatory capture): Ron Wyden has not publicly weighed in on Section 230 reform votes since 2024 One-line summary: Ron Wyden has not publicly weighed in on Section 230 reform votes since 2024 Full evidence trail with source citations and confidence labels: https://goblinhouse.net/wall/disclosure-gap-ron-wyden-section-230-reform-votes-since-2024 This is not original reporting — it's a structured map of public-record evidence (court filings, settlements, disclosures) compiled by…