Goblin House
Roger Wicker has accepted documented donations from sectors with material interests in "data privacy & surveillance policy" but has no public statement, vote, or hearing record on the topic. Robert Mercer — interest area: data privacy & surveillance policy Days silent: 0. The constituent is owed an explanation of the official's position.
Subject: Constituent request: hearing on Roger Wicker has not publicly weighed in on data privacy & surveillance policy Dear Members of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, I am writing to ask the committee to hold a public hearing on the following matter that falls within your jurisdiction: Roger Wicker has not publicly weighed in on data privacy & surveillance policy. The basis of this request is documented in publicly available evidence summarised here: Roger Wicker has not publicly weighed in on data privacy & surveillance policy. Full evidence trail with source citations: https://goblinhouse.net/wall/disclosure-gap-roger-wicker-data-privacy-surveillance-policy This matter has not, to…
Subject: Tip — Roger Wicker has not publicly weighed in on data privacy & surveillance policy Hi The Lever team, Tipping you to a documented accountability gap that aligns with your beat (Money in politics, regulatory capture): Roger Wicker has not publicly weighed in on data privacy & surveillance policy One-line summary: Roger Wicker has not publicly weighed in on data privacy & surveillance policy Full evidence trail with source citations and confidence labels: https://goblinhouse.net/wall/disclosure-gap-roger-wicker-data-privacy-surveillance-policy This is not original reporting — it's a structured map of public-record evidence (court filings, settlements, disclosures) compile…