← The Oversight Wall
HIGH secondary Disclosure Gap

Hillary J. Scholten has not publicly weighed in on Scholten has refused to call for a Gaza ceasefire — signing an anti-de-escalation letter and receiving an 'F' grade (13%) from AJP Action, a pro-Palestinian scorecard

Hillary J. Scholten has accepted documented donations from sectors with material interests in "Scholten has refused to call for a Gaza ceasefire — signing an anti-de-escalation letter and receiving an 'F' grade (13%) from AJP Action, a pro-Palestinian scorecard" but has no public statement, vote, or hearing record on the topic. Expected position: As a Democrat in a D+10 district that includes significant Arab-American and Muslim communities, and as a progressive who emphasizes human dignity, Scholten would be expected to join the majority of her constituents calling for a ceasefire in Gaza. Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: AJP Action gives Scholten an 'F' (13% score): 12% voting record, 20% on letters signed, 0% on co-sponsorships, 0% on statements. She signed an anti-de-escalation letter, signed a letter endorsing Biden's Gaza policies, did not sign ceasefire or conditioning-aid letters, and has never called for a ceasefire. She voted for $17.6B Israel aid, $26.38B Israel supplemental, affirmed Israel's right to exist, condemned 'from the river to the sea' as antisemitic, and opposed censuring Rep. Rashida Tlaib. Meanwhile she has been highly active: held packed town halls (1,000+ attendees), issued press releases on the OBBBA, agriculture bills, housing, and the Iran War Powers Resolution — proving she is communicative but chooses silence on ceasefire. Primary URL: https://ajpaction.org/democratic-scorecard/hillary-scholten/ Days silent: 937. The constituent is owed an explanation of the official's position.

Entities involved: Hillary J. Scholten
Detected: 03 May 2026
Evidence last verified: —
Supporting evidence
No directly attached facts; this gap is derived from connections and structural patterns. See the methodology for how that works.
3 actions you can take
Contact the oversight body
Ask the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform to hold a hearing
Target: House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
▸ Preview the prefilled message
Subject: Constituent request: hearing on Hillary J. Scholten has not publicly weighed in on Scholten has refused to call for a Gaza ceasefire — signing an anti-d

Dear Members of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform,

I am writing to ask the committee to hold a public hearing on the following matter that falls within your jurisdiction: Hillary J. Scholten has not publicly weighed in on Scholten has refused to call for a Gaza ceasefire — signing an anti-d.

The basis of this request is documented in publicly available evidence summarised here: Hillary J. Scholten has not publicly weighed in on Scholten has refused to call for a Gaza ceasefire — signing an anti-de-escalation letter and receiving an 'F' grade (13%) from AJP Action, a pro-…
Open this action →
Tip a journalist
Send this to The Lever
Target: The Lever (David Sirota et al.)
▸ Preview the prefilled message
Subject: Tip — Hillary J. Scholten has not publicly weighed in on Scholten has refused to call for a Gaza ceasefire — signing an anti-de-escalation letter and receiving an 'F' grade (13%) from AJP Action, a pro-Palestinian scorecard

Hi The Lever team,

Tipping you to a documented accountability gap that aligns with your beat (Money in politics, regulatory capture):

Hillary J. Scholten has not publicly weighed in on Scholten has refused to call for a Gaza ceasefire — signing an anti-de-escalation letter and receiving an 'F' grade (13%) from AJP Action, a pro-Palestinian scorecard

One-line summary: Hillary J. Scholten has not publicly weighed in on Scholten has refused to call for a Gaza ceasefire — signing an anti-de-escalation letter and receiving an 'F' grade (13%) from AJP Action, a pro-Palestinian scorecard

Full evi…
Open this action →
Support a watchdog
Support Campaign Legal Center, who has jurisdiction over this
Target: Campaign Legal Center
Open this action →
Read how the Oversight Wall derives gaps and what it deliberately does not do — methodology. If you are the subject of this gap or believe the underlying evidence is wrong, please use our corrections process.