Goblin House
Claim investigated: The FEC shows the Trump campaign made payments to Cambridge Analytica LLC during the 2016 election cycle, though the precise overlap with Bannon's board tenure requires cross-referencing with Companies House resignation filings Entity: Steve Bannon Original confidence: inferential Result: STRENGTHENED → SECONDARY
This inference is highly credible and can likely be confirmed through FEC disbursement records and UK Companies House filings. The Trump campaign's Cambridge Analytica payments are documented public record, and Bannon's board position at SCL Group/Cambridge Analytica is established fact. The timing overlap question requires cross-referencing FEC payment dates with Companies House director appointment/resignation records.
Reasoning: Established facts confirm Bannon's Cambridge Analytica board role and Trump campaign's documented payments to the firm. FEC records are searchable by recipient entity and would show exact payment dates. UK Companies House requires director appointment/resignation filings with specific dates, allowing precise timeline verification of Bannon's tenure overlap with campaign payments.
FEC: Trump Make America Great Again Committee OR Donald J Trump for President disbursements to 'Cambridge Analytica'
Would provide exact dates, amounts, and purposes of Trump campaign payments to Cambridge Analytica
Companies House: SCL Group Limited (02821983) director appointments and resignations for Stephen Kevin Bannon
Would establish precise dates of Bannon's board tenure at Cambridge Analytica's parent company
FEC: Make America Number 1 super PAC expenditures to Cambridge Analytica or SCL Group
Would reveal whether Mercer-funded entities also paid Cambridge Analytica while Bannon coordinated both sides
SEC EDGAR: Cambridge Analytica Corp OR SCL Group Limited foreign company filings
Would identify any US securities filings that might detail corporate structure and officer roles
SIGNIFICANT — This relationship represents a concrete example of potential conflicts of interest in the 2016 Trump campaign, where a senior campaign official maintained governance role at a vendor receiving campaign funds. The precise timing and overlap would be crucial for understanding the scope of this relationship and any potential FEC violations.