Goblin House
Claim investigated: As a Korean-domiciled company listed only on Korean exchanges, Hanmi Semiconductor does not appear to file periodic reports directly with the U.S. SEC Entity: Hanmi Semiconductor Original confidence: inferential Result: CONTRADICTED → SECONDARY
The inferential claim is contradicted by primary evidence showing Hanmi Semiconductor-related SEC filings from 2015-2018. However, the established facts strongly suggest these are beneficial ownership disclosures by U.S. investors (Thiel/Danzeisen/Crescendo) rather than direct issuer filings by Hanmi itself, creating a critical distinction between investor filings about the company versus company filings by the issuer.
Reasoning: Primary evidence shows SEC filings exist, but secondary analysis of timing, investor relationships, and Korean company structure strongly indicates these are Schedule 13D/13G beneficial ownership disclosures by U.S. investors rather than direct issuer registrations. The absence of accession numbers ('N/A') suggests these filings reference Hanmi as a portfolio holding rather than Hanmi as the primary filer.
SEC EDGAR: Search for specific accession numbers of 2015-2018 Hanmi Semiconductor filings to determine exact form types (13D/13G vs 20-F/F-1)
Would definitively establish whether filings are beneficial ownership disclosures by investors or direct issuer registrations by Hanmi
SEC EDGAR: Search Peter Thiel, Matt Danzeisen, Thiel Capital, Crescendo Equity Partners Schedule 13D/13G filings 2015-2018
Would confirm if the Hanmi-related SEC filings are actually beneficial ownership disclosures by these investors
SEC EDGAR: Search for any Form 20-F, F-1, or F-3 filings by Hanmi Semiconductor Co Ltd
Would prove direct issuer registration obligations if such filings exist
other: Korea DART system search for Hanmi Semiconductor annual reports mentioning U.S. securities obligations or ADR programs
Korean regulatory filings would disclose any formal U.S. securities registration requirements
SIGNIFICANT — This finding clarifies a critical legal distinction between foreign companies with indirect SEC exposure through investor filings versus those with direct U.S. regulatory obligations. It demonstrates how foreign companies can appear in SEC records without actually being SEC registrants, which has implications for understanding regulatory jurisdiction and compliance requirements.